A JPG Just Sold for $69,000,000.00 #art

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

Wut?

The New York Times, among many others, reports that a piece of (for lack of a better term) static art that exists only digitally was sold for $69,000,000. The article dares to mention the artist responsible for my favorite painting in comparison. By clicking through to the Christie’s site, you can view the art, and thereby take ownership of it for no charge.

Wut?

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc

Follow the New York Times @nytimes

One thought on “A JPG Just Sold for $69,000,000.00 #art

  1. The important thing is, that $69 million couldn’t possibly have been spent in better ways.

    On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:35 PM Frylock’s Geekery wrote:

    > Frylock posted: ” If you enjoy this post, please retweet it. Wut? The New > York Times, among many others, reports that a piece of (for lack of a > better term) static art that exists only digitally was sold for > $69,000,000. The article dares to mention the artist respo” >

    Like

Leave a Reply to JWM Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.