There’s More of Them! #tech #AI #ArtificialIntelligence

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

For a guy that said he was taking a break from blogging three days ago, I sure have had a lot to say. This is a follow up to yesterday’s threat to have my blog generated by artificial intelligence. A while back, I (and many others) shared through social media an AI rendition of Family Guy. Well, the inevitable has happened. There are tons more of them. You can find them here, but I’ve linked directly to my favorites below.

Why does Leela have two eyes? Was this trailer from the Cyber House Rules? If so, where’s Adlai?

We see too much of Kenny’s face here, and Wendy seems too old for Stan. Also, while AI seems to be learning how to handle hands, it still hasn’t mastered the fine art of tear ducts. Cartman is as confusing as an umber hulk, coincidentally with the same shape to his head.

Yes, these are my favorites because I never grew up.

Homer has too much hair.

They got Butthead’s braces right, and I’m glad to see Daria get a mention.

A lot of characters in the video look like they’re being played by the same actor, and as I said above, tear ducts (among other things) still aren’t handled correctly. Then there’s Nothing, Forever, an AI-generated episode of Seinfeld that’s been running since December. It’s 8-bit graphics, so the real “magic” is in the dialogue, but that often falls apart too.

I don’t think we have to worry about an AI takeover anytime soon.

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc

Advertisement

My Blog is Going High-Tech! (Not Really) #blog #tech #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #journalism @buzzfeed

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

All this blogging has been exhausting, but thanks to Buzzkill . . . Buzzfeed, I feel comfortable having all my posts generated by artificial intelligence! https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ai-generated-80s-family-sitcoms

Because Buzzfeed and I are the same level of journalism.

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc
Follow Buzzfeed @buzzfeed

I Figured out Mastodon #Mastodon #SocialMedia #tech

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

A few days ago, I complained about how clunky Mastodon was. I stand by that. However, I managed to figure it out. So, let me tell you some things that, for some ridiculous reason, no one else seems willing to tell you.

First, if you go to Mastodon.com, you’re screwed. It won’t work. So, how do you do it? The best way to get on Mastodon is to know what server you want to join. In my case, I went with https://chirp.enworld.org/web/home. Another popular one for nerds is https://dice.camp/explore. I applied for membership 🙄, which was accepted. Mastadon.social appears to be the baseline, as a few celebrities are on there, but it doesn’t allow signups for some reason (maybe it’s just me). However, I learned that you don’t have to be on a server to follow someone on another server. As long as you see them appear in your server through a re-toot (yeah, their “tweets” were called “toots,” but now they’re called “posts”), you can follow them. I’m not sure how that works, but it does, so there you go.

Now, if I wanted to join a server that’s dedicated to sports, I wouldn’t know where to start. Someone had to give me the name of a server for me to find it. Again, going to Mastodon.com doesn’t help. You just have to know the URL of the server to find it, but for all I know, no such server exists. How could I possible find it?

I’m sure it can be done, but Mastodon is horribly clunky, so it’ll be a slow burn to get there. It’ll also take a while to get followers. To do so, I think I need to pepper my followers on other social media outlets to do so. In other words, the only way to even get on Mastodon in the first place, then to make it work for you, is to use other social media sites. Not a good business plan. Note, however, that there’s a setting in your profile that allows you to be found and promoted based on other members’ searches. It’s off by default, so I imagine you’ll want to turn it on.

So, join whatever server you want, then migrate to my profile and follow me. I’m at https://chirp.enworld.org/web/@gsllc and https://dice.camp/web/@gsllc. I believe these can also be found by searching for gsllc@chirp.enworld.org or gsllc@dice.camp once you’re in Mastodon.

Follow me!

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc

I Don’t Have Time to Get Mastodon to Work #Mastodon #SocialMedia #tech

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

Many of my contacts are flocking to Mastodon, so I decided I’d give it a try. That was a waste of time, and I’ll waste no more time on it.

First, let’s discuss what it is to the extent of my understanding.

Which ain’t much.

Mastodon is a group of servers each acting as its own Twitter. You can create your own server with your own rules, which can cover content or speech moderation. In other words, you can say, “No naughty language,” or “This server is for discussing race cars and nothing else.”

So, I decided to create a login. The first thing it asked me is what kind of server I wanted to join. This is similar to what Twitter does (i.e., asking your interests), but in the case of Mastodon, it’s non-optional. You have to pick one. The choices I was given were about 10 in number. If I attempted to search for others, it would search from among those 10 options. I sighed and picked the one that was closest to what I was interested in, then hit “Next.”

Here, I tried to create my account. No matter what I chose as a username or how I modified my password, I received a “forbidden” message. I went to Google to see if I could find answers (Mastodon help is useless) and found this tweet and an interesting reply.

Image pasted below in case the tweets are later deleted.

I can’t find anything backing up the reply’s claim, but I did find several other complaints posted over the past week (among other issues), so it’s not just me. No matter how idiotically I’m behaving, if your system isn’t idiot proof, it’s not going to be popular.

But I’m no idiot, which is why I’ve stopped trying.

EDIT: It turns out that I am an idiot. I kept trying and succeeded.

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc

A JPG Just Sold for $69,000,000.00 #art

If you enjoy this post, please retweet it.

Wut?

The New York Times, among many others, reports that a piece of (for lack of a better term) static art that exists only digitally was sold for $69,000,000. The article dares to mention the artist responsible for my favorite painting in comparison. By clicking through to the Christie’s site, you can view the art, and thereby take ownership of it for no charge.

Wut?

Follow me on Twitter @gsllc

Follow the New York Times @nytimes